Does anybody really care (about time)…?”
Robert Lamm wrote and sung these lyrics for the band, Chicago, in
1969, a time when so many people were questioning the conflict of Superficiality
vs. Significance. Forty-five years after he asked this question, I want to
give him an answer- I care.
I care about time, well, telling time that is.
I care about writing right and thinking deeply.
I care about the Superficiality of so many edicts handed
down to teachers in the name of progress that are overshadowing and undermining
the Significance of learning.
In regard to time-telling time- let me share a story from my days
in Room 216. While completing a group chart on the symbolism in The
Stranger one October afternoon during Sixth Period, I noticed a trio of
senior boys seeming to be spending more time snickering than scrutinizing
Albert Camus’ words. When I sauntered by their desks, though, they were doing a
credible job of adding examples and explanations from the story, so I left them
alone, but kept an eye on them.
About five minutes later, one of the boys, I’ll call him George,
jumped up, grabbed his back pack and ran from the room, a look of panic turning
his eyes into half dollars. As the door slammed behind him, his buddies
burst into laughter. Seeing my usual raised right eyebrow questioning
glare, Bubba caught his breath and gasped, “We told him it was 2:05.”
George had shown me a check-out pass for two o’clock because he
had a dentist appointment and needed to get out of the parking lot before the
final bell so he wouldn’t be late. The analog clock ticking away above the
door to my room gleamed 1:05. This young man sported a digital watch crowded
with the time, a lap timer, a countdown timer, military time and an hourly
chime, but he Couldn’t. Tell. Time on an analog clock. Big Hand? Small Hand? They
might as well have been hieroglyphics to George .
“Didn’t your parents and teachers have you learn this when you
were in elementary school?” I asked.
“Mine tried,” Amy said, “but the TV, computers, microwave and all
are digital in my house, so it was hard.”
“Same here,” Tyler said. “My teacher had us make clocks from paper
plates with construction paper hands, and told us to practice at home, but it
was much easier to look at any of the digital clocks in the house.”
Incredulous, I just shook my head as told them to get back to work
while Tyler laughed and said, “You need to get with the times, Mrs. C.” His
comment made me wonder if analog clocks were now obsolete. ..or if I was.
I just toured my house. We have exactly one
analog clock- an ancient alarm clock perched on the night stand in the guest bedroom. Oh, and our watches. My husband’s and mine have dials.
analog clock- an ancient alarm clock perched on the night stand in the guest bedroom. Oh, and our watches. My husband’s and mine have dials.
A few weeks later, that same class of seniors and I had another
Close Encounter of That Was Then-This is Now. As I offered information
about the themes in Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis, I scribbled points
about surrealism, alienation, animalism and various other literary terms on the
board while I talked. I say scribbled, because I have never been on friendly
terms with my small motor control, and my half print/half cursive handwriting
clearly showed this. Every year my students had to learn to decipher my
comments on their papers. Their “What does this say, Mrs. C?” type of questions
never stopped me from writing them, though, or kept them from understanding
what I wrote. They learned because they had no choice.
About half way through my lecture, I turned around and noticed
only one student taking notes. “Why aren’t you writing this down?” Annoyance
edged my sigh. “You know the rule- if I write it on the board it’s fair game
for a test.”
“I type a lot faster than I print,” Bubba said. “I’ll remember.”
He smiled and tapped his head.
“So write in cursive.”
Rolled eyes and “Get Real” laughter filled the room. Amy explained
that most of their schools didn’t teach cursive because they spent the time on
material that would be on the SOL tests. “Teachers want us to type our papers,
anyway, and we don’t need to know cursive to send texts or emails,” she added.
Just then, Connor sauntered to the front of the room, aimed his
smart phone at the board a clicked a picture. “See,” he said as a big grin
spread across his face. “Who needs to write down notes?”
Choosing to hand out the novels while my blood pressure
crept down to the safe zone, I told the students to read the first ten pages
and come up with at least one example for each of the terms on the board. Then
I said to Connor, “You’d better hope that your professor allows the 250 kids in
his English 101 seminar to record his lectures on your phone and doesn’t smash
it like the guy in the YouTube video.”
I turned to the whole class, “Some professors have you complete
massive amounts of reading and only test on their lectures, too. Note-taking
isn’t a lost art, my dears.”
Why do schools still need to teach writing in cursive?
Because actually forming the letters develops thinking skills since the brain pings on the letter to write and sends the message to the hand. Grasping a pencil/pen and then forming the letter hones eye-hand coordination.
Writing, be it cursive, printing or a mixture of both (which most
people do) promotes listening skills, and employers will check their candidates
for short term memory/listening skills.
Writing is needed for those dreaded Blue Book college exams, for
SOLs, SATs, GREs, LSATs and the vast majority of licensing exams. Typing
is not permitted.
Writing-Note Taking- is needed in meetings detailing mortgage
loans, doctors diagnoses, and during boss/employee sessions.
Spelling, capitalization and punctuation will always count as will comprehending reading. GrammarCheck is quite fallable. Don't count on it.
Spelling, capitalization and punctuation will always count as will comprehending reading. GrammarCheck is quite fallable. Don't count on it.
Writing in cursive isn’t required legally-maybe it should be if we
want a population that can think clearly and write coherently besides
earning Proficient ratings on standardized tests.
A statistic that I learned in a college education class explained
that if students just listened to a lecture/lesson, in a week they would forget
about 90% of the material; if they read it and talked about it, in a week they
would remember about 60% of the material, but…but, if they listened,
took notes and then discussed the material, in a week they would remember about
90%. If students can’t write about it, can they truly understand the material?
Is cursive becoming as obsolete as analog clocks, too?
Someday, will my grandchildren click onto Facebook- or its
futuristic facsimile- and see pictures of analog clocks, the Declaration of
Independence in all of its cursive glory, mortgage papers and signed checks
with captions asking, “Remember This? like my friends posst of recyclable glass milk and soda bottles, metal (not plastic) TV
character lunch boxes and clothes lines?
Will the significance of teaching children to tell time on an
analog clock or to write in cursive fall victim to quicker and more trendy but
less substantial brainchildren?
“Does anybody really know what time it is
Does anybody really care…?”
Does anybody really care…?”
Howdy Doody always knew what time it was-he always cared. So do I.
Until next week,
Re: "Because actually forming the letters develops thinking skills. Typing doesn’t do that."
ReplyDeleteProof, please?